﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Appeals Board Reporter</title><link>http://www.appealsboardreporter.com</link><description>When It Doesn't Exist Anywhere Else, Find it Here.</description><copyright>California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Reporter, ISSN 1531-6866 Copyright © 2010 Providence Publications, LLC - All Rights Reserved.</copyright><item><title>CRIMINAL CONVICTION REVERSED BECAUSE FALSE STATEMENTS WERE NOT MATERIAL TO THE ELIGIBILITY FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION BENEFITS.</title><description>In &lt;EM&gt;People v. Jos&amp;#233 Garcia&lt;/EM&gt; (2009) 12 WCAB Rptr. 12,077, the criminal conviction for workers' compensation fraud was reversed by the Court of Appeal because there was no substantial evidence that the false statements the defendant made to insurance investigators were material to his eligibility for vocational rehabilitation benefits.</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/articles/ABR00-20100312-003.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:20:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>DURABLE-GOODS MANUFACTURING SECTOR INJURIES DECLINE</title><description>The California Workers' Compensation Institute recently released a report reviewing 208,000 claims filed by durable-goods manufacturing workers in California between 2001 and 2008 and found this sector accounted for 10.9% of all job injuries in 2001, but the percentage has steadily declined, falling to an eight-year low of 6.9% in 2008.</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/articles/ABR00-20100312-002.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:17:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>WRIT GRANTED IN GUZMAN EN BANC DECISION</title><description>The Sixth District Court of Appeal has granted a petition for writ of review of the Appeals Board's en banc decision in &lt;EM&gt;Milpitas Unified School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (Joyce Guzman)&lt;/EM&gt; (2009) 12 WCAB Rptr. 12,072,</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/articles/ABR00-20100312-001.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:13:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>INTERESTING PANEL DECISION</title><description>&lt;STRONG&gt; If there is an express agreement pursuant to Labor Code &amp;sect;5304 between persons or institutions fixing the amounts to be paid for medical, surgical or hospital treatment, the appeals board has no jurisdiction over any controversy concerning the amount due for such treatment. &lt;/STRONG&gt;</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/articles/ABR00-20100226-004.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:02:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>IMPORTANT PANEL DECISION</title><description>&lt;STRONG&gt; Pharmaceuticals dispensed outside Pharmacy Benefit Network are not payable by employer. &lt;/STRONG&gt;</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/articles/ABR00-20100226-003.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:58:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>ONE MILLION DOCUMENT BATCHES SUCCESSFULLY PROCESSED INTO EAMS</title><description>The Division of Workers' Compensation has successfully processed 1 million document batches into the Electronic Adjudication Management System (EAMS), achieving this milestone less than a year and a half since the case management system was activated.</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/articles/ABR00-20100226-002.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:55:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>IMPORTANT PANEL DECISION</title><description>&lt;STRONG&gt; Employer is not liable for pharmaceuticals dispensed outside Pharmacy Benefit Network. &lt;/STRONG&gt;</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/articles/ABR00-20100226-001.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:53:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RAILROAD FELA CASE:  $35.7 MILLION JURY VERDICT FOR  PHYSCIAL PAIN AND MENTAL SUFFERING AFFIRMED BY COURT OF APPEAL</title><description>The Second District Court of Appeal, Division Eight in an unpublished opinion in &lt;EM&gt;Eric Doi v. Union Pacific Railroad Company&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2010) 12 WCAB Rptr. 12,046, affirmed a jury verdict of $35.7 million in non economic damages involving a quadriplegic.</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/RAILROAD-FELA-CASE.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:25:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS BY AGRICULTURE WORKERS</title><description>The California Workers' Compensation Institute (CWCI) recently published a study of workers' compensation claims by agriculture workers, which showed that 70% of the injured workers were represented by attorneys and that over half of the lost-time cases close within a year. Together with geographic differences, lower wages and a different mix of injuries resulted in lower-than-average medical and indemnity benefits.</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/WORKERS-COMPENSATION-CLAIMS-BY-AGRICULTURE-WORKERS.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:16:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>COURT OF APPEAL DECISION</title><description>&lt;STRONG&gt; For an employer to be liable under Labor Code &amp;sect;3602(b )(2), the employee must establish the existence of three conditions: (1) the employer concealed the existence of the injury, (2) the employer concealed the connection between the injury and the employment, and (3) the injury was aggravated following the concealment. &lt;/STRONG&gt;</description><link>http://appealsboardreporter.com/articles/ABR00-20100203-001.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:13:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>